I think it’s time we sit down and have a discussion about Zoosadism, and more specifically how it is allowed to be broadcasted on the same platform where terms such as “murder”/“suicide” are replace with “unalive”. To pander to advertiser’s sensibilities, of course. Apparently, advertisers are less offended by baby monkeys being tortured than by people saying “sexual assault” instead of “SA”. You can’t say “gun”, but you can post videos of baby rabbits being torn apart by snapping turtles.
There are entire YouTube channels which directly profit from filming live feeding videos; which is a form of Zoosadism, fyi. Just about any snake can be converted into a frozen feeder, so don’t give me any fucking excuses for you filming kittens being fed to your boas. I have zero patience for zoosadists and will not be hosting any comments excusing them.
Meanwhile, True Crime and Educational channels must jump through hoops to avoid being demonetized.
That’s due to YouTube having inconsistent standards when it comes to what the CEO and advertisers consider to be “vulgar and violent content”. I’ve reported many videos where it’s obvious that people maim livestock to be fed to Komodo dragons. There’s also many fake animal rescue channels that abuse animals so that they can stage a dramatic rescue.
It’d be one thing if these videos emerged during the early days of YouTube. However, YouTube is a 19 year old platform with its terms of service being inconsistently enforced. Due to how large it has gotten, I think it is time that it should be regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)- the same people who regulate cable. If the CEO, Neal Mohan, refuses to actually do something about Zoosadists on YouTube, then it should be handed over to government bodies.
I will write another post should there be an update to this situation. It’s sickening that the platform allows this in the first place.
Comments
Post a Comment